The gallery needs to be copied, as such we must do a deep comparison
instead of comparing the pointers. We also can't do the comparison
afterwards, as the gallery is owned by the operation and that operation
is finished already.
This tests all relevant scenarios of device removal, i.e.:
* device is not open
* device is currently closing
* device is open and idle
* device is currently opening
* device is open and active
The test ensures that in all scenarios the following holds true:
* device "removed" signal is only emitted after the action completes
* context "device-removed" signal is only emitted after the device has
been closed
Note that the "opening" case is special. Here we confirm that a success
from "open" will not be overriden by a FP_DEVICE_ERROR_REMOVED error, in
order to correctly signal that the internal device state is open and it
needs to be closed.
We require the close call, but as the underlying transport layer is
gone, it will generally just return an error.
In principle, it makes sense to think of close as a function that always
succeeds (i.e. it makes no sense to try again). Should the device be in
a bad state, then a subsequent open() will simply fail.
While the image device has its own finger status tracking, we use a simpler
version as public data information, so let's just report the finger-on/off
and when a finger is expected to the parent class.
Verify that this happens as expected using the virtual-image class
It is not very useful to just delete the data again after a failure, as
it might be useful for debugging. Just store it into an "errors"
subdirectory of the PWD in the hope that this is a sane location.
Note that it'll error out if the directory already exists, but that
should be acceptable in all cases. i.e. it won't exist in the CI and
developers can just wipe the directory.
During verify/identify complete we replace the error pointer that the driver
returned with another error we created, after clearing that one.
However, when we initialize a new error the compiler may reuse the same
allocation of the cleared one, and this might lead to a test failure.
So, don't be so fragile and ignore the pointer check
The unittest_parser script would try to import FPrint gi module, but it
would fail as per the fact that none is installed yet, so make sure that
we don't load any FPrint module until we try to actually run the tests
Devices with no storage don't allow listing prints, and if we try to do
that, we'd end up in trying to call a NULL function pointer, causing a crash
So always check if the device has storage before calling the list vfunc, and
if we fail, return an error.
Include an unit-test to verify this situation
We are already using a number of defines and autoptrs from newer GLib
releases. Add the appropriate compatibility defines rather than removing
the corresponding code.
Closes: #222
The g_object_new call had a NULL argument for a property. This meant
that the compiler could not warn about the lack of NULL termination for
the argument list.
Add the missing NULL termination.
This was added as alias to the error check, but given we're passing to the
callback both the error and the match itself, we can just avoid adding an
extra parameter that could be confusing (as may imply that the matching
happened).
Also clarify the documentation and ensure that the match value is properly
set in tests.
We were not testing the image device error reporting functions yet
inside libfprint (fprintd already had such tests). Add tests to make
sure we catch errors earlier.
