aes2501: Harden against low finger pressure
Wait for 3 empty frames before stopping the scan The driver used to stop the scan immediately after an empty frame (by checking for hist sum == 0), but it is possible to get empty frames in the middle of the scan due to low finger pressure. Waiting for 3 empty frames stop the driver wrongly aborting the scan too early. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56715
This commit is contained in:
parent
84b97ea15b
commit
d8aae30a67
1 changed files with 23 additions and 18 deletions
|
@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct aes2501_dev {
|
|||
GSList *strips;
|
||||
size_t strips_len;
|
||||
gboolean deactivating;
|
||||
int no_finger_cnt;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
typedef void (*aes2501_read_regs_cb)(struct fp_img_dev *dev, int status,
|
||||
|
@ -559,12 +560,6 @@ static void capture_read_strip_cb(struct libusb_transfer *transfer)
|
|||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* FIXME: would preallocating strip buffers be a decent optimization? */
|
||||
stripdata = g_malloc(192 * 8);
|
||||
memcpy(stripdata, data + 1, 192*8);
|
||||
aesdev->strips = g_slist_prepend(aesdev->strips, stripdata);
|
||||
aesdev->strips_len++;
|
||||
|
||||
threshold = regval_from_dump(data + 1 + 192*8 + 1 + 16*2 + 1 + 8,
|
||||
AES2501_REG_DATFMT);
|
||||
if (threshold < 0) {
|
||||
|
@ -579,20 +574,29 @@ static void capture_read_strip_cb(struct libusb_transfer *transfer)
|
|||
}
|
||||
fp_dbg("sum=%d", sum);
|
||||
|
||||
/* FIXME: 0 might be too low as a threshold */
|
||||
/* FIXME: sometimes we get 0 in the middle of a scan, should we wait for
|
||||
* a few consecutive zeroes? */
|
||||
/* FIXME: we should have an upper limit on the number of strips */
|
||||
|
||||
/* If sum is 0, finger has been removed */
|
||||
/* Sum is 0, maybe finger was removed? Wait for 3 empty frames
|
||||
* to ensure
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (sum == 0) {
|
||||
aesdev->no_finger_cnt++;
|
||||
if (aesdev->no_finger_cnt == 3) {
|
||||
/* assemble image and submit it to library */
|
||||
assemble_and_submit_image(dev);
|
||||
fpi_imgdev_report_finger_status(dev, FALSE);
|
||||
/* marking machine complete will re-trigger finger detection loop */
|
||||
fpi_ssm_mark_completed(ssm);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
fpi_ssm_jump_to_state(ssm, CAPTURE_REQUEST_STRIP);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* obtain next strip */
|
||||
/* FIXME: would preallocating strip buffers be a decent optimization? */
|
||||
stripdata = g_malloc(192 * 8);
|
||||
memcpy(stripdata, data + 1, 192*8);
|
||||
aesdev->no_finger_cnt = 0;
|
||||
aesdev->strips = g_slist_prepend(aesdev->strips, stripdata);
|
||||
aesdev->strips_len++;
|
||||
|
||||
fpi_ssm_jump_to_state(ssm, CAPTURE_REQUEST_STRIP);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -677,6 +681,7 @@ static void start_capture(struct fp_img_dev *dev)
|
|||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
aesdev->no_finger_cnt = 0;
|
||||
ssm = fpi_ssm_new(dev->dev, capture_run_state, CAPTURE_NUM_STATES);
|
||||
fp_dbg("");
|
||||
ssm->priv = dev;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue