fp-image-device: Report finger status changes to the device

While the image device has its own finger status tracking, we use a simpler
version as public data information, so let's just report the finger-on/off
and when a finger is expected to the parent class.

Verify that this happens as expected using the virtual-image class
This commit is contained in:
Marco Trevisan (Treviño) 2020-03-26 21:42:35 +01:00 committed by Marco Trevisan
parent 3c382cac7f
commit 893ff9c033
2 changed files with 41 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -140,6 +140,19 @@ fp_image_device_change_state (FpImageDevice *self, FpiImageDeviceState state)
priv->state = state;
g_object_notify (G_OBJECT (self), "fpi-image-device-state");
g_signal_emit_by_name (self, "fpi-image-device-state-changed", priv->state);
if (state == FPI_IMAGE_DEVICE_STATE_AWAIT_FINGER_ON)
{
fpi_device_report_finger_status_changes (FP_DEVICE (self),
FP_FINGER_STATUS_NEEDED,
FP_FINGER_STATUS_NONE);
}
else if (state == FPI_IMAGE_DEVICE_STATE_AWAIT_FINGER_OFF)
{
fpi_device_report_finger_status_changes (FP_DEVICE (self),
FP_FINGER_STATUS_NONE,
FP_FINGER_STATUS_NEEDED);
}
}
static void
@ -395,6 +408,19 @@ fpi_image_device_report_finger_status (FpImageDevice *self,
FpImageDevicePrivate *priv = fp_image_device_get_instance_private (self);
FpiDeviceAction action;
if (present)
{
fpi_device_report_finger_status_changes (device,
FP_FINGER_STATUS_PRESENT,
FP_FINGER_STATUS_NONE);
}
else
{
fpi_device_report_finger_status_changes (device,
FP_FINGER_STATUS_NONE,
FP_FINGER_STATUS_PRESENT);
}
if (priv->state == FPI_IMAGE_DEVICE_STATE_INACTIVE)
{
/* Do we really want to always ignore such reports? We could
@ -684,6 +710,8 @@ fpi_image_device_open_complete (FpImageDevice *self, GError *error)
priv->state = FPI_IMAGE_DEVICE_STATE_INACTIVE;
g_object_notify (G_OBJECT (self), "fpi-image-device-state");
fpi_device_report_finger_status (FP_DEVICE (self), FP_FINGER_STATUS_NONE);
fpi_device_open_complete (FP_DEVICE (self), error);
}

View file

@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ class VirtualImage(unittest.TestCase):
def done_cb(dev, res):
print("Enroll done")
fp = dev.enroll_finish(res)
self.assertEqual(self.dev.get_finger_status(), FPrint.FingerStatusFlags.NONE)
self._enrolled = fp
template = FPrint.Print.new(self.dev)
@ -182,6 +183,7 @@ class VirtualImage(unittest.TestCase):
date = GLib.Date()
date.set_dmy(*datetime.get_ymd()[::-1])
template.props.enroll_date = date
self.assertEqual(self.dev.get_finger_status(), FPrint.FingerStatusFlags.NONE)
self.dev.enroll(template, None, progress_cb, tuple(), done_cb)
# Note: Assumes 5 enroll steps for this device!
@ -192,25 +194,36 @@ class VirtualImage(unittest.TestCase):
# Test the image-device path where the finger is removed after
# the minutiae scan is completed.
self.send_finger_automatic(False)
self.assertEqual(self.dev.get_finger_status(), FPrint.FingerStatusFlags.NEEDED)
self.send_finger_report(True)
self.assertEqual(self.dev.get_finger_status(),
FPrint.FingerStatusFlags.NEEDED | FPrint.FingerStatusFlags.PRESENT)
self.send_image(image)
while self._step < 2:
ctx.iteration(True)
self.send_finger_report(False)
self.assertEqual(self.dev.get_finger_status(), FPrint.FingerStatusFlags.NEEDED)
self.send_finger_automatic(True)
self.send_image(image)
while self._step < 3:
ctx.iteration(True)
self.assertEqual(self.dev.get_finger_status(), FPrint.FingerStatusFlags.NEEDED)
self.send_image(image)
while self._step < 4:
ctx.iteration(True)
self.assertEqual(self.dev.get_finger_status(), FPrint.FingerStatusFlags.NEEDED)
self.send_image(image)
while self._enrolled is None:
ctx.iteration(True)
self.assertEqual(self.dev.get_finger_status(), FPrint.FingerStatusFlags.NONE)
return self._enrolled
def test_enroll_verify(self):