Implement discover() methods for upeke2 and upeksonly
upeksonly handles revision 1 devices, upeke2 revision 2 devices. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504399
This commit is contained in:
parent
df4a6f53d2
commit
73561989dd
2 changed files with 14 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -846,7 +846,10 @@ static struct fpi_ssm *deinitsm_new(struct fp_dev *dev)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static int discover(struct libusb_device_descriptor *dsc, uint32_t *devtype)
|
static int discover(struct libusb_device_descriptor *dsc, uint32_t *devtype)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
/* FIXME: Detect whether dsc represents a device that we can handle */
|
/* Revision 2 is what we're interested in */
|
||||||
|
if (dsc->bcdDevice == 2)
|
||||||
|
return 1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1011,6 +1011,15 @@ static void dev_deinit(struct fp_img_dev *dev)
|
||||||
fpi_imgdev_close_complete(dev);
|
fpi_imgdev_close_complete(dev);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
static int dev_discover(struct libusb_device_descriptor *dsc, uint32_t *devtype)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
/* Revision 1 is what we're interested in */
|
||||||
|
if (dsc->bcdDevice == 1)
|
||||||
|
return 1;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static const struct usb_id id_table[] = {
|
static const struct usb_id id_table[] = {
|
||||||
{ .vendor = 0x147e, .product = 0x2016 },
|
{ .vendor = 0x147e, .product = 0x2016 },
|
||||||
{ 0, 0, 0, },
|
{ 0, 0, 0, },
|
||||||
|
@ -1023,6 +1032,7 @@ struct fp_img_driver upeksonly_driver = {
|
||||||
.full_name = "UPEK TouchStrip Sensor-Only",
|
.full_name = "UPEK TouchStrip Sensor-Only",
|
||||||
.id_table = id_table,
|
.id_table = id_table,
|
||||||
.scan_type = FP_SCAN_TYPE_SWIPE,
|
.scan_type = FP_SCAN_TYPE_SWIPE,
|
||||||
|
.discover = dev_discover,
|
||||||
},
|
},
|
||||||
.flags = 0,
|
.flags = 0,
|
||||||
.img_width = IMG_WIDTH,
|
.img_width = IMG_WIDTH,
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue